Management in livestock production requires a change in the EAT-Lancet diet in Europe

  • 1.

    Godfray, HCJ et al. Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Science 327, 812–818 (2010).

    CAS ADS Google Scholar article

  • 2.

    Foley, J.A. et al. Solutions for a transplanted planet. temper nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

    CAS ADS Google Scholar article

  • 3.

    Godfray, HCJ et al. Meat consumption, health and the environment. Science 361, eaam5324 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 4.

    Willett, W et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT-Lancet Committee on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Diets. Lancet 393, 447-492 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 5.

    Springman, M et al. Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modeling analysis in detail at the country level. Lancet Planet. the health 2, e451–e461 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 6.

    Eme, P. E., Douwes, J., Kim, N., Foliaki, S. & Burlingame, B. Review of methodologies for assessing sustainable food systems and the potential for developing harmonized indicators. Int J. Approx. Precision. Public Health 16, 1184 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 7.

    Van de Kamp, ME et al. Healthy diets with low environmental impact? Greenhouse gas emissions from different diets adhering to Dutch food-based dietary guidelines. Nutritional precision. Int 104, 14 to 24 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 8.

    Mertens, E. et al. Improving the health and carbon footprint of European diets using a normative approach. Clin Public Health. 24, 565–575 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • 9.

    Stephen, W et al. Planetary Frontiers: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • 10.

    Campbell, B.M. et al. Agricultural production as a major driver of the Earth system that transcends planetary boundaries. Ecol. company 22, 4 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 11.

    Frehner, A., Muller, A., Schader, C., De Boer, I.J.M. & Van Zanten, HHE. Systematic choices make differences in environmentally friendly nutritional solutions. Earth. Food section. 24, 100333 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • 12.

    Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing the environmental impacts of foods by producers and consumers. Science 360, 987-992 (2018).

    CAS ADS Google Scholar article

  • 13.

    Ross and others. Greed or needy? Land use and climate impacts on food in 2050 under various livestock futures. Earth. on. Chang. 47, 1-12 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 14.

    Van Xanten, HHE et al. Define land limits for sustainable animal consumption. Earth. Chang. Biol. 24, 4185-4194 (2018).

    Article ADS Scholar from Google

  • 15.

    Van Hall, O. et al. Recycling food scraps and grass resources through livestock: livestock system impact and productivity. J. Clean. prod. 219, 485-496 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 16.

    Schader, C., Muller, A., Scialabba, NE, Hecht, J. & Stolze, M. Comparing global and product-based life-cycle assessment perspectives on the environmental impacts of low-concentration ruminant production. in a Brooke. The 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014) (eds. Schenck, R. & Huizen, D.) San Francisco, California, USA, 1203-1209 (2014).

  • 17.

    Van Kernebeek, H. R. J., Oosting, S. J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Bikker, P. & De Boer, I. J. M. Saving land to feed a growing population: consequences of consuming crops and livestock products. Int Life Cycle Assessment. 21, 677-687 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 18.

    Van Zanten, HHE, Wan Ittersum, MKD & e Boer, IJM The role of farm animals in a circular diet. Earth. Food section. 21, 18-22 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 19.

    De Boer, IJM & Van Ittersum, MK Circular in agricultural production (Wageningen University and Research, 2018) https://www.wur.nl/upload_mm/7/5/5/14119893-7258-45e6-b4d0-e514a8b6316a_Circularity-in-agricultural-production-20122018.pdf

  • 20.

    Mutt, A. et al. Livestock: on our plates or eating at our table? New analysis of the feed/food debate. Earth. Food section. 14, 1–8 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 21.

    Shader, C. et al. The effects of feeding livestock less competitive forage for food on the sustainability of the global food system. JR Corporation. user interface 12, 20150891 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • 22.

    Nutritional reference values ​​for nutrients. summary report (European Food Safety Authority, 2017).

  • 23.

    Oni, Dr.; et al. Whole-grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause- and specific-cause mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 353, 1-14 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Plutzar, C. et al. Changes in spatial patterns of human allocation to net primary production (HANPP) in Europe 1990-2006. Reg. on. Chang. 16, 1225-1238 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 25.

    Haberl and others. Quantification and Mapping of Human Allocation of Net Primary Production in Earth’s Terrestrial Ecosystems. Brooke. Natal Acad. Sciences. United States of America 10412942-12947 (2007).

    CAS ADS Google Scholar article

  • 26.

    Velthof, G.L. et al. Integrated assessment of nitrogen losses from agriculture in EU-27 using Mitera-Europe. J. Approx. koala. 38, 402-417 (2009).

    Article CAS Scholar from Google

  • 27.

    Elizabeth, L, Machado, B, Zinocare, M, Baker, B, & Lawrence, M. Ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a narrative review. Nutrients 12, 1955 (2020).

    Article CAS Scholar from Google

  • 28.

    Murphy, S. P. & Allen, L. H. The nutritional importance of animal source foods. Clin. 133, 3932S–3935S (2003).

    Article CAS Scholar from Google

  • 29.

    Ross and others. Protein futures in Western Europe: potential land use and climate impacts in 2050. Reg. on. Chang. 17, 367–377 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 30.

    Itmadi, A. et al. Mortality from various causes associated with meat, heme iron, nitrate, and nitrite in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study: A cohort, population-based study. BMJ 357, j1957 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 31.

    Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J. K., Wright, N. & Ujang, Z. Bin The food waste hierarchy as a framework for managing food surplus and waste. J. Clean. prod. 76106-115 (2014).

    Google Scholar article

  • 32.

    zu Ermgassen, EKHJ, Phalan, B., Green, RE, & Balmford, A. Reducing land use for pork production in the European Union: where there is syrup, there is a way. food policy 58, 35-48 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 33.

    Herero M et al. Innovation can accelerate the shift towards a sustainable food system. nat. food 1, 266-272 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • 34.

    Carlson, KM et al. Intensity of greenhouse gas emissions from global croplands. nat. Clem. Chang. 7, 63-68 (2017).

    CAS ADS Google Scholar article

  • 35.

    Rijk, B., van Ittersum, M. & Withagen, J. Genetic advances in Dutch crop yields. Precision field crops. 149, 262-268 (2013).

    Google Scholar article

  • 36.

    Fisher, T.; , Burley, Dr. & Edmids, J.; Crop yields and global food security. Will increasing yields continue to feed the world? euro. Agricultural Rev. Economie. 43, 191-192 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 37.

    Shiels, R et al. Grain yield gaps across Europe. euro. J. Agron. 101109-120 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 38.

    FAOSTAT (FAO, 2019) http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home

  • 39.

    Velinga, T. V. et al. Footprint methodology: A tool for measuring greenhouse gas emissions for feed production and use. alive. Precision. re come back. 674, 121 (2013).

    Google Scholar

  • 40.

    Technical Conversion Factors for Agricultural Commodities (FAO, 1996).

  • 41.

    Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Otterdijk, R. & Meybeck, A. Global Food Losses and Food Waste – Extent, Causes and Prevention (2011).

  • 42.

    Van Hall, OR. Biomass recycling in a circular diet: the role of livestock and fish. Doctoral thesis, University of Wageningen (2020) https://doi.org/10.18174/524412

  • 43.

    Bacon, J.W. and Van Weismael, D. CVB Feeding Schedule 2021 (CVB, 2021) www.cvbdiervoeding.nl

  • 44.

    International Aquaculture Feed Formulas Database (IAFFD, 2018).

  • 45.

    Food and Nutrient Database (US Department of Agriculture, 2020).

  • 46.

    L.A. Lagerwerf, A. Bannink, C. van Bruggen, C.M. Groenestein, J.F.M. Huijsmans, WOt-Technical report 148 JWH van der Kolk, H.H. Luesink, S.M. van der Sluis, G.L. Velthof & J. Vonk A methodology for estimating emissions from agriculture in the Netherlands – 2019 update (Nature and Environment Systematic Research Tasks Unit, 2019) https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/549203

  • 47.

    Van Hal, O., Weijenberg, AAA, De Boer, IJM & Van Zanten, HHE Accounting forage and food competition in environmental impact assessment: Towards a resource-efficient diet. J. Clean. prod. 240, 118241 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 48.

    IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Chapter 10, 87 (IPCC, 2006).

  • 49.

    Zom, RLG & Groenestein, CM Livestock excretion of volatile solids to account for methane production from manure. RAMIRAN 2015, 16th International Conference on Rural-Urban Coexistence, 8-10 September 2015, Hamburg, Germany (2015).

  • 50.

    IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Chapter 11, 54 (2006).

  • 51.

    MacLeod, M. J., Hasan, M. R., Robb, D. H. & Mamun-Ur-Rashid, M. Measuring greenhouse gas emissions from global aquaculture. Science delegate. 10, 11679 (2020).

    Article CAS Scholar from Google

  • 52.

    IPCC. Climate change 2013: the basis of the physical sciences (Stocker eds., TF et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013) https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/

  • Leave a Comment